On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Sean Hunt <ride...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Taral wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com>
> wrote:
> >> =========================  Criminal Case 2458  =========================
> >>
> >>    Yally violated Rule 1789 by failing to ensure that henceforth
> >>    all may know that Kelly deregistered in a Writ of FAGE.
> >
> > GUILTY/APOLOGY. Prescribed words: {}
> >
> I intend, with 2 support, to appeal this judgment. Yally cannot have
> violated Rule 1789 as it imposes no obligations on em. See CFJ 2459.
>

I support this.

Reply via email to