Taral wrote: > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Sean Hunt <ride...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I intend, with 2 support, to appeal this judgment. Yally cannot have >> violated Rule 1789 as it imposes no obligations on em. See CFJ 2459. > > I missed something? 2459 is still pending, and doesn't have any > arguments to that effect. > comex just judged it.
- DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2458 assigned to Taral Aaron Goldfein
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2458 assigned to... Sean Hunt
- DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2458 assigned to Tar... Taral
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2458 assigne... Sean Hunt
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2458 assigne... Taral