2009/3/25 comex <com...@gmail.com>:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn
> <jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Add the following after the third section of rule 2148 (the ambassador):
>> "If a foreign nomic allows for one player to join on behalf of Agora,
>> only the ambassador may do so. The ambassador MAY then, without 3
>> objections, take any action in that nomic."
>>
>> Create an obligation for the ambassador to request membership in
>> Internomic 2 on behalf of Agora in a timely fashion.
>
> Proposals can't create one-off obligations like this. Also, note that
> InterNomic II's ruleset contains:
> {
> All member nomics must always abide by all Internomic II rules then in
> effect, in the form in which they are then in effect.
> }
>
> though there doesn't seem to be any mechanism for enforcement and
> certainly the proposed rule wouldn't make that clause effective.
>
Okay, I guess I didn't really know exactly what was allowed since I
just read "outline changes to the gamestate". The only thing I can see
that would stop it is that it requires higher power than the 1 it gets
from adoption index, but then again I don't have that high search-fu,
so if anyone points out which rule it is I will retract the proposal.
And on the internomic rules, I have already asked c-walker exactly
what that means: simply that when the liaison takes action in
internomic, e must follow its rules. Agora doesn't have to force em to
do so by means of Agoran rules. And "how he sees fit" as already in
the ambassador rule should take care of that.
The thread over there for reference:
http://internomic2.wikidot.com/forum/t-140378/member-nomics-following-the-in2-rules
--
-Tiger
