DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5674-5681

[ais523]

On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 08:48 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Aug 2008, Roger Hicks wrote:
> >> 5681 O 1 1.0 BobTHJ              PRS Changes
> 
> This sort of messing around means any contract, no matter how well-
> protected in the contract itself against change, can be amended by 
> majority (ordinary) vote.  Not good.  Do you want all your contracts
> subjected to a majority vote? 
> 
> I submit the following proposal, Contract Security, AI-2:
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Increase the power of Rule 2198 to 2.
> 
> Amend Rule 2198 by prepending the following sentence to the
> first paragraph:
> 
>     Contract changes are secured.
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> -Goethe
> 
No good, a power-1 rule could simply force all parties to a contract to
amend it by agreement of all parties, maybe even act on behalf of them
to do it too.
-- 
ais523