Wooble wrote: > In any case, there appears to be precedent beyond just game custom > that regulated actions are impossible to perform unless otherwise > authorized by the rules, but unfortunately the CotC database stops 2 > cases later than the one I found cited (CFJ 1237), but CFJ 1295a does > say that 1237 established this quite clearly.
I've just entered CFJs 1238 and 1237 into the database. (I had to estimate several dates for CFJ 1237. Also, despite Kelly's claim to "remand", e actually meant REASSIGN; REMAND was not added as an appellate judgement until Proposal 4298, almost two years later.)
