On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 8 May 2008, Ian Kelly wrote: >> I don't see how you claim that "this judgement makes this contract >> into a contest" is equivalent to "the following agreement is a >> contest". > > They are both "I say it is, therefore it is" and in that sense > equivalent(ly ineffective).
How is that any different from this? "I spend two notes of the same pitch to make Goethe gain one note of the same pitch. The pitch of these notes is C#." Rule 2126 doesn't actually say anywhere that I'm permitted to specify the pitch of the notes I spend. -root
