On Thu, 8 May 2008, Ian Kelly wrote: > ACK: Agora says: "now that you entered a contest as judgement in an > equity case, and that contract has gone into effect per Rule 2169, you > are recognized by our rules as a contest..." Rule 2136 does not say > that it can be the only means to creating a contest.
But it does make being a contest regulated via 2125(b). And there's no backing at all for your assertion that judgements can arbitrarily change or set regulated properties. In fact that assertion is discredited. Saying "this judgement makes this contract into a contest" or equivalently asserting "the following agreement is a contest" is as powerless and ineffective as saying "this judgement changes your FOR vote to AGAINST" or "This judgement hereby grants root 5 points." -Goethe
