On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 10:40 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Furthermore, Enigma explicitly acknowledges that it is /intended/ to be > a contest ("The purpose of this contract is to be a contest..."), and > thus implicitly acknowledges that it will fail to operate as intended > if it loses that status.
I picked an existing contest at random without checking its text, and apparently I picked a bad example. I see no reason to think, however, that such explicit acknowledgment is necessary to actually being a contest. -root