On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 10:40 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  Furthermore, Enigma explicitly acknowledges that it is /intended/ to be
>  a contest ("The purpose of this contract is to be a contest..."), and
>  thus implicitly acknowledges that it will fail to operate as intended
>  if it loses that status.

I picked an existing contest at random without checking its text, and
apparently I picked a bad example.  I see no reason to think, however,
that such explicit acknowledgment is necessary to actually being a
contest.

-root

Reply via email to