On 1/28/08, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/28/08, Iammars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I SUPPORT, also on the basis that the phrase "purpose of enjoyment" is
> > ambiguous as to whether is modifies nomic or games. If it modifies games,
> > then I cite the definition in CFJ 1860 as to refute this.
>
> There's a comma there for a reason.
It occurs to me that the comma actually adds ambiguity. The phrase
"intended..." was supposed to modify nomic.
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
