On 1/28/08, Iammars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I SUPPORT, also on the basis that the phrase "purpose of enjoyment" is > ambiguous as to whether is modifies nomic or games. If it modifies games, > then I cite the definition in CFJ 1860 as to refute this.
There's a comma there for a reason.
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
