On Jan 28, 2008 11:36 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 28, 2008 10:48 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Statement: Canada is a nomic. > > I judge CFJ 1879 FALSE. This has been endlessly debated, but in the > > end it is a matter of definitions. I believe that nomics are first and > > foremost *games*, intended for the purpose of enjoyment. Canada does > > not satisfy this, and thus is not a nomic. > > I intend [with two support] to appeal this. > > Arguments: Judgement is not sufficiently verbose and does not appeal > to sufficiently esoteric sources for its logic. >
I SUPPORT, also on the basis that the phrase "purpose of enjoyment" is ambiguous as to whether is modifies nomic or games. If it modifies games, then I cite the definition in CFJ 1860 as to refute this. -- -----Iammars www.jmcteague.com
