On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, Ian Kelly wrote: > On Jan 15, 2008 3:50 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> The legal basis around which partnerships were created was, roughly, >>> that a person is an entity upon which legal obligations can be >>> imposed. >> >> That's partnerships, but not agreements in general. > > Irrelevant. We're talking about partnerships losing their personhood, > not about nonperson contracts losing their personhood, which they > don't have in the first place.
No, we're talking about if a partnership loses its personhood, as a nonperson is it still bound to other non-partnership contracts that it signed while a person? Or are we talking about two entirely different things again? -Goethe
