On Jan 16, 2008 12:08 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Except, we've just changed the rules so that these CFJs no longer apply. > It's no longer enough to retain the capacity, the partnership must be > public. So it's no contradiction that the contract didn't change and > is still binding, but is no longer sufficient for personhood due to > some technicality (of not being public).
Good enough for me. In fact, those CFJs stopped applying as soon as we created an explicit definition of "person" several months ago. -root
