On Dec 3, 2007 2:45 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Dec 3, 2007 11:36 AM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Dec 3, 2007 11:31 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Let me introduce you to my private contract that says that anyone who > > > posts a message to agora-business and signs it "BobTHJ" pledges their > > > unquestioning loyalty to the contract, deregisters from any nomics > > > they may be a Player in, and pledges to send all of their money to me > > > in unmarked bills. You're just as bound by that contract as Agora is > > > by the Fookiemyartug contract, i.e., not at all. > > > > Compare CFJ 1455. > > > > -root > > > My counterargument is that Fookiemyartug did not attempt to bind > anyone under its contract or arbitrarily award a win. It only did so > in response to Agora's action which was taken with Agoran Consent. > Agora, in effect, authorized the win.
Proto-action: I intend, with Agoran Consent, to award myself a Win. Can I create such a possible dependent action out of thin air without using a Proposal? -- Geoffrey Spear http://www.geoffreyspear.com/
