On Dec 3, 2007 10:54 AM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So you're saying that Fookiemyartug could not have contained that text > at the time CFJ 1799 was called? In that case, I move to SUSTAIN in > 1799a and OVERTURN with FALSE in 1805a.
s/could not have contained/could not plausibly have contained/ -root
