On Dec 3, 2007 1:00 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That was the reason I didn't invoke CFJ 1455 in my appeal arguments; > the judge's arguments in that case are not quite apropos. It doesn't > make your reasoning sound, though. You haven't yet responded to my > earlier comparison of this to a hypothetical B Nomic rule reading > "Whenever Agora adopts a proposal, they are also surrendering". > Clearly, if B Nomic had such a rule, and we adopted a proposal, we > would not consider that to be an act of surrender. What makes this > case any different? > B Nomic is not an entity governed by the rules of Agora. Fookiemyartug on the other hand was created under Agoran law, and within its contract it submits to it. The reason such a B Nomic rule would not be recognized is because B Nomic is a foreign entity that exists independantly of Agora. Also, the adoption of any arbitrary proposal is considerably different than Agora expressly authorizing the action (by means of Agoran Consent).
BobTHJ
