On 12/3/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ian Kelly wrote: > >I do not consent. With the nkep scam fully exposed, > > How was it exposed, btw? Who leaked? You know, when I called CFJ 1799 I fully intended nkep to be nonsense. Don't confuse that attempted scam with this new nkep-means-win scam.
- Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: judicial status Kerim Aydin
- Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: judicial status Ian Kelly
- Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: judicial status Zefram
- Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: judicial status comex
- Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: judicial status Ian Kelly
- Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: judicial s... Ian Kelly
- Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: judicial s... Roger Hicks
- Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: judici... Ian Kelly
- Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: judici... Kerim Aydin
- Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: judicial status Ian Kelly
- Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: judicial status Roger Hicks
- Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: judicial status Geoffrey Spear
- Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: judicial s... Ian Kelly
- Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: judici... Roger Hicks