On Dec 3, 2007 10:33 AM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It seems to me that the standard of CFJ 1361 should be applied to > actions as well as to nicknames. As a private definition, "nkep" did > not clearly specify an action to most Agorans at the time the CFJ was > issued; therefore it should be judged as a non-action. > Yet you are ignoring the fact that it was clearly used as an action within its context. I even confirmed this by having Agora perform said action, which you yourself supported (albiet conditionally). This is seriously opposed to the permitted unless regulated concept. Just becuase Agora does not understand what an action is, does that mean it should not be allowed to be performed?
Also, R101 does not come into play here. Weather or not you are bound by Fookiemyartug has little effect on this outcome. Fookiemyartug is not imposing any obligations upon you which you Agoran rights would prevent. BobTHJ
