Levi wrote:
Just noticed that Rule 2160 uses POSSIBLE.If it's the reverse of IMPOSSIBLE, it would be defined the same as CAN. But then, in Rule 2160, I'm not sure POSSIBLE is the right term?
There was a proposal to change it to LEGAL, whereupon it was pointed out that many actions are LEGAL but IMPOSSIBLE due to R2125(c); I think this spawned much of the recent MMI debate, in fact. Changing it to POSSIBLE-and-LEGAL would avoid this problem.
