Levi Stephen wrote: > MAY: Performing the described action does not violate the rule in > question > >But, MAY is probably better defined along the lines of > > MAY: Performing the described action is permitted
These two definitions appear equivalent to me. That's what "permitted" means. >Leaving it out of the part about not violating the rule in question might >be best here? Parse error on your sentence, so I'm not sure if you're agreeing with me or suggesting something else. I'm saying that the definition of "MAY" should not say anything about the permissibility of not performing the action. -zefram
