Zefram wrote:
Levi Stephen wrote:
MAY: Performing the described action does not violate the rule in
question
But, MAY is probably better defined along the lines of
MAY: Performing the described action is permitted
These two definitions appear equivalent to me. That's what "permitted"
means.
Sorry, should have said worded, rather than defined. It's good that they
are equivalent ;)
Leaving it out of the part about not violating the rule in question might
be best here?
Parse error on your sentence, so I'm not sure if you're agreeing with
me or suggesting something else. I'm saying that the definition of
"MAY" should not say anything about the permissibility of not performing
the action.
I think I am agreeing. The definition of MAY is probably best as
"Performing the described action is permitted"
Levi
