root wrote: > On a somewhat related note, are the various partnerships aware that if > CFJ 1684 is sustained, they will not have been considered persons > until the adoption of R2145 and will need to have registered > subsequent to that event to be considered players?
Acutely. Five months worth of gamestate. I would submit a ratification-type proposal. Failing that, I would deregister in a Writ of FAGE, and let someone else clean up the mess.