root wrote:

> On a somewhat related note, are the various partnerships aware that if
> CFJ 1684 is sustained, they will not have been considered persons
> until the adoption of R2145 and will need to have registered
> subsequent to that event to be considered players?

Acutely.  Five months worth of gamestate.  I would submit a
ratification-type proposal.  Failing that, I would deregister
in a Writ of FAGE, and let someone else clean up the mess.

Reply via email to