On 7/10/07, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/10/07, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So is Primo just ignoring the decision of CFJ 1659 or what?
I believe so. Wasn't this amended shortly thereafter to fix the problem?
Yes and no. After P5038, the rules definition of "by announcement" is
a default, but the Primo charter would still need to redefine it to
use it differently. It also doesn't retroactively validate anything
done "by announcement" to the Corporate Forum before the change took
effect.
-root
