On 7/10/07, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was away for a week, then back, then away again this week. Primo Issue #23 assigns CFJ 1688 to Murphy to answer on behalf of Primo, and CFJ 1694 to myself to answer on behalf of Primo. The slowness has been due to the lack of a VPSA report summarizing the voting results of Issue #23, which is my responsibility to publish...but I have been gone.
So is Primo just ignoring the decision of CFJ 1659 or what? On a somewhat related note, are the various partnerships aware that if CFJ 1684 is sustained, they will not have been considered persons until the adoption of R2145 and will need to have registered subsequent to that event to be considered players? -root
