I believe BobTHJ is on vacation without net access for the entire week; he mentioned it somewhere at Nomicapolis, where he's our Scorekeeper.
On 7/10/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
P.S. Why isn't Primo judging its cases, anyway? On 7/10/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I object. I intend, without 2 objections, to change Zefram to lying > down. I intend, without objection, to make Zefram inactive. > > On 7/10/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As Primo Corporation is not judging its assigned cases, I intend to > > change it to lying down, without 2 objections. (I'll be able to do > > that under the fifth paragraph of rule 1871/11 if I'm CotC at the time, > > which seems a likely turn of events.) > > > > -zefram > > >
-- Geoffrey Spear http://www.geoffreyspear.com/
