On 7/10/07, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So is Primo just ignoring the decision of CFJ 1659 or what?
I believe so. Wasn't this amended shortly thereafter to fix the problem? BobTHJ
On 7/10/07, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So is Primo just ignoring the decision of CFJ 1659 or what?
I believe so. Wasn't this amended shortly thereafter to fix the problem? BobTHJ