Magical device called a fusion splicer.  Our reels were typically 33,000’


From: Josh Luthman 
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2024 3:51 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] fiber patch cables

I don't see how you have a 50 mile span.  Even if you get 80k reels that's 15 
miles.

On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 5:19 PM <ch...@go-mtc.com> wrote:

  When you have spans up to 50-75 miles at times, you have to use longer high 
power pulses.  There is a lot of variability in velocity of propagation, earth 
temperature, splice slack loops, fiber twist.  1 mile error over 50 miles is 
only 2%.  You can easily be off by several thousand feet.  You can’t just go 
dig.  You have to go to the closest splice point and test again, even then if 
you it show the fault 2000 feet away and you dig at 2000 feet you may be off by 
20 feet or more.  I have been doing this for decades.  Takes lots of digging to 
actually find it.  

  From: Josh Luthman 
  Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2024 3:01 PM
  To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group 
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] fiber patch cables

  A mile?!  IDK how that's possible.  Every time we turn a new splitter on the 
sequentials and OTDR are within a few feet - we lose a couple of feet in butt 
splices and our sequentials end up wrong.  Every new reel gets tested on 
delivery and it's right on. 

  When we had a broken fiber (ants) it was right on the case.  When we had a 
broken fiber (ribbon got knicked with installation) it was between two cases.

  On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 3:48 PM <ch...@go-mtc.com> wrote:

    Wow, sometimes looking for gopher damager over 20 miles I have been off a 
mile.  



    From: Josh Luthman 
    Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2024 1:30 PM
    To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group 
    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] fiber patch cables

    So far every time we've used the OTDR it's been accurate within 1 foot.

    On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 12:55 PM Trey Scarborough <t...@3dsc.co> wrote:

      The only thing you have to worry about with shorter cables is the 
reflection. In some instances with dirty connector at just the right connector 
you can get reflection back in to the transmitter that can cause errors, the tx 
to shut down or premature failure. This is very uncommon with LR 10G and less 
optics and can be prevented from making sure you have clean connectors. Check 
the RX and TX levels and make sure you don't have excessive loss. With 100G its 
a little different story due to the combined power of multiple channels, but 
still can be prevented by cleaning connectors, but in some instances Ive had to 
use attenuation when mixing different vendor optics.

      The using no launch on an OTDR most automatically calibrating OTDRs will 
work without one. Your results can be off though. Most of the lower cost ones 
are also lower powered and have less of an RX sensitivity so they don't suffer 
as much from the reflections interfering when testing. I can test all day long 
with my little otdrs without one, but my long range 200k+ units I have to have 
a minimum of a 1k spool on it or you see ghosts. They will show up as repeating 
events at even intervals. Not something you will see on shorter runs either.




      On 8/26/24 4:31 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:

        I should note that apparently I used to do this with direct attach 
cables (DAC) but I think that was a pain, one more thing to stock and to bring 
with for projects.  Whereas I’d always have boxes full of SFPs and fiber patch 
cords.



        From: AF mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com On Behalf Of Josh Luthman
        Sent: Monday, August 26, 2024 4:20 PM
        To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group mailto:af@af.afmug.com
        Subject: Re: [AFMUG] fiber patch cables



        People say you need a launch cable but our cheap china OTDRs have no 
issues seeing the connector at the end of the patch cable and stuff beyond.  I 
bought a big launch cable back in the day and never use it anymore.



        Might be different with AE?



        On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 5:16 PM <ch...@go-mtc.com> wrote:

          Only minimum length I know of is the OTDR dead zone.  If that is a 
problem you purposely lengthen the cable with a launch cable.  



          From: Josh Luthman 

          Sent: Monday, August 26, 2024 1:59 PM

          To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group 

          Subject: Re: [AFMUG] fiber patch cables



          Reddit is wrong.  Gasp. 



          Connectors are loss, there is more loss in either one of the 
connectors than there is the single mode glass.



          Between a switch/router in a rack what I see all the time is long 
(like 5/10/15 feet) cables and then put the slack in a loop along the posts.



          On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 1:19 PM TJ Trout <t...@voltbb.com> wrote:

            Patchbox makes some great products, their fiber system is pretty 
slick but expensive.  



            Cable length is irrelevant it's optical budget / Rx signal 
strength. Normally on 2-20k LR optics you are ok with any length cable, 40km+ 
needs a pad on short spans. (Attenuator)



            On Mon, Aug 26, 2024, 8:29 AM Ken Hohhof <khoh...@kwom.com> wrote:

              Is there a minimum length for a single mode fiber patch cable?



              I have been using 1 meter cables and they are almost always too 
long, I’m talking about going between routers and switches in a rack, stuff 
like that.  I see that FS sells 0.5 meter cables, but I saw somewhere like 
maybe on Reddit someone claiming there was a minimum length.  Given SM fiber 
and LR optics, I don’t see how 0.5 or 1.0 meter would be different they are 
both essentially zero length.



              Probably there’s some kind of cable tray or cable management 
solution I could be using but I’ve never liked such things. 

              -- 
              AF mailing list
              AF@af.afmug.com
              http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

            -- 
            AF mailing list
            AF@af.afmug.com
            http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


----------------------------------------------------------------------

          -- 
          AF mailing list
          AF@af.afmug.com
          http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

          -- 
          AF mailing list
          AF@af.afmug.com
          http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


         
      -- 
      AF mailing list
      AF@af.afmug.com
      http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    -- 
    AF mailing list
    AF@af.afmug.com
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

    -- 
    AF mailing list
    AF@af.afmug.com
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  -- 
  AF mailing list
  AF@af.afmug.com
  http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

  -- 
  AF mailing list
  AF@af.afmug.com
  http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to