Are you claiming the speed of light in vacuum is fake news now?
Jared
> From: "Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com>
> To: af@af.afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Starlink latency highly variable - up to 120 ms
>
> We won't have "facts" for at least a year. In the mean time everyone is
> blowing smoke.
>
>
> bp
> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>
> On 11/3/2020 7:57 AM, fiber...@mail.com wrote:
> > From: "Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com>
> > To: af@af.afmug.com
> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Starlink latency highly variable - up to 120 ms
> >> I call that BS. It means they can route the traffic to the nearest end
> >> point. I think it will make a massive difference.
> > You can call BS all day long til you are blue in the face, it won't
> > change facts.
> >
> > The minimum end user latency is dominated by the RF space segment which
> > is currently averaging 40 ms. There are promises about lowering this, but
> > nobody has ever claimed any numbers lower than 20 ms.
> >
> > It means jack all to the end user if Starlink uses a space laser to do
> > one or two hops when they have to pay a 20-40 ms penalty to go up and down.
> >
> >
> > Jared
> >
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
