https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m05abdGSOxY
On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 9:34 AM Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote: > I'd like to see someone run smokeping from a local server out to every hop > along the path out to the public Internet. Set it up to 1 ping every second > so that you get that depth of detail. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > ------------------------------ > *From: *fiber...@mail.com > *To: *af@af.afmug.com > *Sent: *Tuesday, November 3, 2020 9:29:31 AM > *Subject: *[AFMUG] Starlink latency highly variable - up to 120 ms > > The first beta testers have received their UFOs and performance reports > are emerging. While download speeds are respectable on an empty network, > Starlink's main weakness is its highly variable latency. > > Typical beta user minimum latencies are in the mid 30ies with very high > variability. Ping tests that hover around 40 ms will go to high 60ies from > one second to the other. Worst case latencies are well over 100 ms. > > The last part is what I consider disqualifying Starlink for RDOF funds > meeting the low-latency standard, but I guess that's what Elon has lawyers > for. > > > Jared > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
