Forgot all about that massive power requirement. We did DC+fiber to avoid ethernet issues.
Josh Luthman 24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 2:50 PM Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: > I think he said 3 GHz 450m which requires direct DC power because it uses > like 1.21 gigawatts. > > > > *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman > *Sent:* Thursday, September 24, 2020 1:28 PM > *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com> > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Power for 450M via PacketFlux or Rectifier? > > > > If you need sync...power it over that too. > > > > In my case, we don't need sync on our deployment so we went fiber + DC. > No sync - we've got a bomb shelter building for a good bit of shielding. > > > > Josh Luthman > 24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 1:57 PM Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: > > I can’t remember last time I power cycled an AP, it’s been years. > > > > Only time would be if I did something stupid and needed to do the quick > power cycle to get into the Recovery Console. Usually that wouldn’t be an > AP that’s in service, but one from the used pile that I’m planning to > redeploy but I didn’t label where it came from. > > > > Sometimes after a year or two uptime some of the Ubiquiti stuff will go > off to Lalaland and need a reboot, I had to do an old Powerbridge the other > day, but I could still reboot it from the GUI. I had an old > Karlnet/YDI/Terabeam/Proxim backhaul radio that needed to be power cycled > regularly but that was 15 years ago and it got replaced with a PTP500 which > has now been replaced with a PTP820. > > > > > > *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *Sean Heskett > *Sent:* Thursday, September 24, 2020 12:30 PM > *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com> > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Power for 450M via PacketFlux or Rectifier? > > > > Either way is fine, we’ve chosen to do it in the PacketFlux RI so that > everything is standardized across our towers. Support staff and field > techs know that ALL APs get power from a rack injector...so when problems > happen look there and try a reboot. > > > > -Sean > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 9:18 AM Josh Baird <joshba...@gmail.com> wrote: > > We're deploying our first 450M gear soon. This site will have a +48VDC > ICT rectifier solution and DC distribution (managed). > > > > We're going to be using a PacketFlux RackInkjector w/ Cambium Sync modules > to provide sync to the 450M 3ghz radios. We could load a PDU module in the > RackInjector as well to provide power to them. Alternatively, we could > power them directly off of the ICT managed distribution. > > > > Both solutions are managed (can turn them on/off via IP). Is there any > reason to use the PacketFlux PDU module over the DC distribution panel in > this scenario? > > > > Cheers, > > > > Josh > > > > -- > > AF mailing list > > AF@af.afmug.com > > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
