Yep - standardization is a good thing! On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 1:30 PM Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us> wrote:
> Either way is fine, we’ve chosen to do it in the PacketFlux RI so that > everything is standardized across our towers. Support staff and field > techs know that ALL APs get power from a rack injector...so when problems > happen look there and try a reboot. > > -Sean > > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 9:18 AM Josh Baird <joshba...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> We're deploying our first 450M gear soon. This site will have a +48VDC >> ICT rectifier solution and DC distribution (managed). >> >> We're going to be using a PacketFlux RackInkjector w/ Cambium Sync >> modules to provide sync to the 450M 3ghz radios. We could load a PDU >> module in the RackInjector as well to provide power to them. >> Alternatively, we could power them directly off of the ICT managed >> distribution. >> >> Both solutions are managed (can turn them on/off via IP). Is there any >> reason to use the PacketFlux PDU module over the DC distribution panel in >> this scenario? >> >> Cheers, >> >> Josh >> >> >> -- >> >> AF mailing list >> >> AF@af.afmug.com >> >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> >> -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
