Turn on uGPS on the 450m, add a sync box junior nearby, buy a second gland for the Aux port, plug it all in, Voila! Sync. No need to run cable all the tower.
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 12:01 PM Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: > https://store.packetflux.com/syncbox-junior-aux-port-version/ > > Josh Luthman > 24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 1:17 PM TJ Trout <t...@voltbb.com> wrote: > >> What are the sync options for 450m? Poe+sync or aux port? No on-board gps >> for self sync?? >> >> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020, 9:57 AM Josh Baird <joshba...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Or just use a cnPulse/SyncBox or something like that at the top of the >>> tower next to the radio.. so, you aren't running CAT5 all the way up your >>> tower. >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 12:53 PM Josh Luthman < >>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Do you mean use fiber for ethernet connectivity but run cat5 for sync? >>>> >>>> Josh Luthman >>>> 24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340 >>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>> Suite 1337 >>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 11:55 AM Gino A. Villarini <g...@aeronetpr.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> You can use single sync solutions per AP, so no Ethernet runs >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *Gino* >>>>> *Villarini *Founder/President >>>>> @gvillarini >>>>> t: 787.273.4143 Ext. 204 >>>>> [image: aeronet-logo] <http://www.aeronetpr.com/> [image: inc500] >>>>> <https://www.inc.com/profile/aeronet> [image: fb-logo] >>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/aeronetpr/> [image: insta-logo] >>>>> <https://www.instagram.com/aeronetpr/?hl=en> [image: in-logo] >>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/aeronet-broadband-corp> [image: >>>>> tw-logo] >>>>> <https://twitter.com/AeroNetPR?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor> >>>>> [image: yt-logo] >>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCr2Q9WBrAYVm3Fn970Jd6VA> >>>>> www.aeronetpr.com | Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, PR 00968 >>>>> >>>>> *From: *AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> on behalf of Josh Luthman < >>>>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> >>>>> *Reply-To: *AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com> >>>>> *Date: *Friday, September 25, 2020 at 10:05 AM >>>>> *To: *AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com> >>>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Power for 450M via PacketFlux or Rectifier? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I don't need no damn sync. I have a building with more than enough >>>>> FTB. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>> 24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340 >>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 9:58 AM Josh Baird <joshba...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> You (we) still need power+sync even if you use fiber.. We're planning >>>>> on using fiber, too. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 9:53 AM Josh Luthman < >>>>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Forgot all about that massive power requirement. We did DC+fiber to >>>>> avoid ethernet issues. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>> 24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340 >>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 2:50 PM Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I think he said 3 GHz 450m which requires direct DC power because it >>>>> uses like 1.21 gigawatts. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman >>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, September 24, 2020 1:28 PM >>>>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com> >>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Power for 450M via PacketFlux or Rectifier? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> If you need sync...power it over that too. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> In my case, we don't need sync on our deployment so we went fiber + >>>>> DC. No sync - we've got a bomb shelter building for a good bit of >>>>> shielding. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>> 24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340 >>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 1:57 PM Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I can’t remember last time I power cycled an AP, it’s been years. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Only time would be if I did something stupid and needed to do the >>>>> quick power cycle to get into the Recovery Console. Usually that wouldn’t >>>>> be an AP that’s in service, but one from the used pile that I’m planning >>>>> to >>>>> redeploy but I didn’t label where it came from. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Sometimes after a year or two uptime some of the Ubiquiti stuff will >>>>> go off to Lalaland and need a reboot, I had to do an old Powerbridge the >>>>> other day, but I could still reboot it from the GUI. I had an old >>>>> Karlnet/YDI/Terabeam/Proxim backhaul radio that needed to be power cycled >>>>> regularly but that was 15 years ago and it got replaced with a PTP500 >>>>> which >>>>> has now been replaced with a PTP820. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *Sean Heskett >>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, September 24, 2020 12:30 PM >>>>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com> >>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Power for 450M via PacketFlux or Rectifier? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Either way is fine, we’ve chosen to do it in the PacketFlux RI so that >>>>> everything is standardized across our towers. Support staff and field >>>>> techs know that ALL APs get power from a rack injector...so when problems >>>>> happen look there and try a reboot. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -Sean >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 9:18 AM Josh Baird <joshba...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> We're deploying our first 450M gear soon. This site will have >>>>> a +48VDC ICT rectifier solution and DC distribution (managed). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> We're going to be using a PacketFlux RackInkjector w/ Cambium Sync >>>>> modules to provide sync to the 450M 3ghz radios. We could load a PDU >>>>> module in the RackInjector as well to provide power to them. >>>>> Alternatively, we could power them directly off of the ICT managed >>>>> distribution. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Both solutions are managed (can turn them on/off via IP). Is there >>>>> any reason to use the PacketFlux PDU module over the DC distribution panel >>>>> in this scenario? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Josh >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> AF mailing list >>>>> >>>>> AF@af.afmug.com >>>>> >>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> AF mailing list >>>>> AF@af.afmug.com >>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> AF mailing list >>>>> AF@af.afmug.com >>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> AF mailing list >>>>> AF@af.afmug.com >>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> AF mailing list >>>>> AF@af.afmug.com >>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> AF mailing list >>>>> AF@af.afmug.com >>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> AF mailing list >>>> AF@af.afmug.com >>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>> >>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> AF@af.afmug.com >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > -- -- *Sam Lambie* Taosnet Wireless Tech. 575-758-7598 Office www.Taosnet.com <http://www.newmex.com>
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
