Thats great. That shows the variability between markets. On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 12:25 PM Mark Radabaugh <m...@amplex.net> wrote:
> I’m sticking with my 85% number, and I have the customers and data to > prove it. > > Mark > > > On Apr 15, 2020, at 9:48 AM, Matt Hoppes < > mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote: > > > > That also is what we have found. > > > > I was actually going to say 35% take rate -- but since I've gotten shot > down on previous e-mails where I've sent out "crazy" and "ridiculous" > statistics, I figured I'd send the higher end of the spectrum :) > > > > On 4/15/20 9:12 AM, Lewis Bergman wrote: > >> I second the 50% rate. Probably 35% if you have some other competition > other than satellite. At either one of those rates, you should have enough > neighbor referrals that anything other than a yard sign would be a waste. > >> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 6:36 AM Matt Hoppes < > mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net <mailto: > mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net>> wrote: > >> We see about 50% take rate even when we are the only option. > >> > On Apr 15, 2020, at 6:26 AM, Mark Radabaugh <m...@amplex.net > >> <mailto:m...@amplex.net>> wrote: > >> > > >> > I’m thinking around 85%. Some depends on your market. We have > >> a few areas where I think about 5% of the housing is abandoned. > Take another 10% that are not interested. There is an older > >> population that just isn’t interested or that their needs are met by > >> iPads and cellular. > >> > > >> > That 85% number seems consistent for us on both wireless and > >> fiber routes. > >> > > >> > Mark > >> > > >> >> On Apr 15, 2020, at 12:29 AM, Steve Jones > >> <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com <mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> What percentage of rural customers would you all consider > saturated? > >> >> > >> >> I have access to some new datasets and it disturbing. It's good > >> disturbing, but unanticipated. > >> >> > >> >> May be bad. > >> >> > >> >> Is there a rural percentage of capture that is considered > >> saturated as a standard? 100 percent is what we all want. But there > >> are customers who dont want, or simply cannot afford internet > >> access. There has to be some numbers out there. > >> >> > >> >> I doubt government numbers count, since government is dumb. > >> Where does a simpleton such as myself go to find out what is > >> considered saturated? > >> >> > >> >> Say I touch 1000 households. What is the percentage of capture > >> that marketing is no longer recommended? If I have 500 of them, I'd > >> think that's pretty good, maybe even saturated between lack of need, > >> want, or ability and offset by whatever percentage per terrain would > >> be co sided unservicable. I'd assume my midwest flatlands > >> unservicable would be different than Johnny paychecks Arkansas hills > >> unservicable. > >> >> > >> >> These numbers have to be somewhere > >> >> -- > >> >> AF mailing list > >> >> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> > >> >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > AF mailing list > >> > AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> > >> > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > >> -- AF mailing list > >> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> > >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > >> -- > >> Lewis Bergman > >> 325-439-0533 Cell > > > > -- > > AF mailing list > > AF@af.afmug.com > > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > -- Lewis Bergman 325-439-0533 Cell
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
