In our rural areas, with FTTH on a road for several years, we usually get no higher than 75%.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020, 12:30 AM Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > What percentage of rural customers would you all consider saturated? > > I have access to some new datasets and it disturbing. It's good > disturbing, but unanticipated. > > May be bad. > > Is there a rural percentage of capture that is considered saturated as a > standard? 100 percent is what we all want. But there are customers who dont > want, or simply cannot afford internet access. There has to be some numbers > out there. > > I doubt government numbers count, since government is dumb. Where does a > simpleton such as myself go to find out what is considered saturated? > > Say I touch 1000 households. What is the percentage of capture that > marketing is no longer recommended? If I have 500 of them, I'd think that's > pretty good, maybe even saturated between lack of need, want, or ability > and offset by whatever percentage per terrain would be co sided > unservicable. I'd assume my midwest flatlands unservicable would be > different than Johnny paychecks Arkansas hills unservicable. > > These numbers have to be somewhere > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
