What percentage of rural customers would you all consider saturated? I have access to some new datasets and it disturbing. It's good disturbing, but unanticipated.
May be bad. Is there a rural percentage of capture that is considered saturated as a standard? 100 percent is what we all want. But there are customers who dont want, or simply cannot afford internet access. There has to be some numbers out there. I doubt government numbers count, since government is dumb. Where does a simpleton such as myself go to find out what is considered saturated? Say I touch 1000 households. What is the percentage of capture that marketing is no longer recommended? If I have 500 of them, I'd think that's pretty good, maybe even saturated between lack of need, want, or ability and offset by whatever percentage per terrain would be co sided unservicable. I'd assume my midwest flatlands unservicable would be different than Johnny paychecks Arkansas hills unservicable. These numbers have to be somewhere
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
