I second the 50% rate. Probably 35% if you have some other competition other than satellite. At either one of those rates, you should have enough neighbor referrals that anything other than a yard sign would be a waste.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 6:36 AM Matt Hoppes < mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote: > We see about 50% take rate even when we are the only option. > > > On Apr 15, 2020, at 6:26 AM, Mark Radabaugh <m...@amplex.net> wrote: > > > > I’m thinking around 85%. Some depends on your market. We have a few > areas where I think about 5% of the housing is abandoned. Take another 10% > that are not interested. There is an older population that just isn’t > interested or that their needs are met by iPads and cellular. > > > > That 85% number seems consistent for us on both wireless and fiber > routes. > > > > Mark > > > >> On Apr 15, 2020, at 12:29 AM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> What percentage of rural customers would you all consider saturated? > >> > >> I have access to some new datasets and it disturbing. It's good > disturbing, but unanticipated. > >> > >> May be bad. > >> > >> Is there a rural percentage of capture that is considered saturated as > a standard? 100 percent is what we all want. But there are customers who > dont want, or simply cannot afford internet access. There has to be some > numbers out there. > >> > >> I doubt government numbers count, since government is dumb. Where does > a simpleton such as myself go to find out what is considered saturated? > >> > >> Say I touch 1000 households. What is the percentage of capture that > marketing is no longer recommended? If I have 500 of them, I'd think that's > pretty good, maybe even saturated between lack of need, want, or ability > and offset by whatever percentage per terrain would be co sided > unservicable. I'd assume my midwest flatlands unservicable would be > different than Johnny paychecks Arkansas hills unservicable. > >> > >> These numbers have to be somewhere > >> -- > >> AF mailing list > >> AF@af.afmug.com > >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > > > > > -- > > AF mailing list > > AF@af.afmug.com > > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > -- Lewis Bergman 325-439-0533 Cell
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
