Moin, > The intricacies with "one /44 for 15 sites = 1 or 16 charging units?" > etc. came up over the years... so giving clear guidance to the NCC on > what is to be considered "a chargeable assignment according to the > charging scheme" is definitely a worthy goal.
While I generally agree, I am still not sure whether that should be part of the assignment policy, or a separate document. Along with that, I would also argue that a tiered approach tying PI prices relatively to the membership fee in some way might be a good way forward (as noted in the previous mail). In any case, the current proposal does not necessarily change the incentive structure, as it does not change that one /44 vs. 16 /48 from the same request would still only be charged once for EUR75/year under either version of the policy. So, I would argue that--while I generally agree that the incentive issue is certainly imperative to solve--it is not something to solve in the current iteration/change. With best regards, Tobias ----- To unsubscribe from this mailing list or change your subscription options, please visit: https://mailman.ripe.net/mailman3/lists/address-policy-wg.ripe.net/ As we have migrated to Mailman 3, you will need to create an account with the email matching your subscription before you can change your settings. More details at: https://www.ripe.net/membership/mail/mailman-3-migration/
