In every instance of example.com in the draft this could also be an onion domain, however it most likely that ACME will be used over the plain Internet - so I will leave it as example.com.
I will let others chime in on weather they'd like to see acme-server.example.com or example.com in the RFC. ------------------------------ Any statements contained in this email are personal to the author and are not necessarily the statements of the company unless specifically stated. AS207960 Cyfyngedig, having a registered office at 13 Pen-y-lan Terrace, Caerdydd, Cymru, CF23 9EU, trading as Glauca Digital, is a company registered in Wales under № 12417574 <https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/12417574>, LEI 875500FXNCJPAPF3PD10. ICO register №: ZA782876 <https://ico.org.uk/ESDWebPages/Entry/ZA782876>. UK VAT №: GB378323867. EU VAT №: EU372013983. Turkish VAT №: 0861333524. South Korean VAT №: 522-80-03080. AS207960 Ewrop OÜ, having a registered office at Lääne-Viru maakond, Tapa vald, Porkuni küla, Lossi tn 1, 46001, trading as Glauca Digital, is a company registered in Estonia under № 16755226. Estonian VAT №: EE102625532. Glauca Digital and the Glauca logo are registered trademarks in the UK, under № UK00003718474 and № UK00003718468, respectively. Ar Llun, 13 Ion 2025 am 15:41 Paul Wouters <paul.wout...@aiven.io> ysgrifennodd: > > My point was that using a DNS name like "example.com" in this case has > another implication, that it is using real DNS > and thus is not a tor/onion connection. I just want to make sure that for > all uses of "example.com", it is indeed going over > the regular internet and not over an onion connection. > > I personally think it is useful too to say like acme-server.example.com > to convey better what the example entry is used for. > > Paul > > > On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 4:07 AM Q Misell <q...@as207960.net> wrote: > >> >> Hi Paul, >> >> Thanks for the comments. >> >> > I find the use of "example.com" confusing. >> >> The use of example.com is copied over directly from RFC8555, so I don't >> see a need to choose something different here. >> >> > Maybe explaining (for non tor experts) the relationship between key >> identifiers and the XXXX.onion site name? >> >> Could you elaborate? I don't quite follow. >> >> > The use of "the author wishes" is a left over from when this was an >> individual document. As this is now a WG document it should be generalized, >> eg "it is desired" ? >> >> Will fix. >> >> Q >> ------------------------------ >> >> Any statements contained in this email are personal to the author and are >> not necessarily the statements of the company unless specifically stated. >> AS207960 Cyfyngedig, having a registered office at 13 Pen-y-lan Terrace, >> Caerdydd, Cymru, CF23 9EU, trading as Glauca Digital, is a company >> registered in Wales under № 12417574 >> <https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/12417574>, >> LEI 875500FXNCJPAPF3PD10. ICO register №: ZA782876 >> <https://ico.org.uk/ESDWebPages/Entry/ZA782876>. UK VAT №: GB378323867. >> EU VAT №: EU372013983. Turkish VAT №: 0861333524. South Korean VAT №: >> 522-80-03080. AS207960 Ewrop OÜ, having a registered office at Lääne-Viru >> maakond, Tapa vald, Porkuni küla, Lossi tn 1, 46001, trading as Glauca >> Digital, is a company registered in Estonia under № 16755226. Estonian VAT >> №: EE102625532. Glauca Digital and the Glauca logo are registered >> trademarks in the UK, under № UK00003718474 and № UK00003718468, >> respectively. >> >> >> Ar Llun, 6 Ion 2025 am 18:04 Paul Wouters via Datatracker < >> nore...@ietf.org> ysgrifennodd: >> >>> Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for >>> draft-ietf-acme-onion-05: No Objection >>> >>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all >>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this >>> introductory paragraph, however.) >>> >>> >>> Please refer to >>> https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ >>> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. >>> >>> >>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-acme-onion/ >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> COMMENT: >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> I find the use of "example.com" confusing. Does this mean a valid DNS >>> identifier in the real DNS accessed over the regular internet? If not, >>> should >>> it not be better to use "example.onion" ? Maybe also using something like >>> "acme-server.example.com" could be a bit clearer? >>> >>> Maybe explaining (for non tor experts) the relationship between key >>> identifiers >>> and the XXXX.onion site name? >>> >>> Section 8.2: >>> The use of "the author wishes" is a left over from when this was an >>> individual >>> document. As this is now a WG document it should be generalized, eg "it >>> is >>> desired" ? >>> >>> >>> >>>
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list -- acme@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to acme-le...@ietf.org
