My point was that using a DNS name like "example.com" in this case has another implication, that it is using real DNS and thus is not a tor/onion connection. I just want to make sure that for all uses of "example.com", it is indeed going over the regular internet and not over an onion connection.
I personally think it is useful too to say like acme-server.example.com to convey better what the example entry is used for. Paul On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 4:07 AM Q Misell <q...@as207960.net> wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > Thanks for the comments. > > > I find the use of "example.com" confusing. > > The use of example.com is copied over directly from RFC8555, so I don't > see a need to choose something different here. > > > Maybe explaining (for non tor experts) the relationship between key > identifiers and the XXXX.onion site name? > > Could you elaborate? I don't quite follow. > > > The use of "the author wishes" is a left over from when this was an > individual document. As this is now a WG document it should be generalized, > eg "it is desired" ? > > Will fix. > > Q > ------------------------------ > > Any statements contained in this email are personal to the author and are > not necessarily the statements of the company unless specifically stated. > AS207960 Cyfyngedig, having a registered office at 13 Pen-y-lan Terrace, > Caerdydd, Cymru, CF23 9EU, trading as Glauca Digital, is a company > registered in Wales under № 12417574 > <https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/12417574>, > LEI 875500FXNCJPAPF3PD10. ICO register №: ZA782876 > <https://ico.org.uk/ESDWebPages/Entry/ZA782876>. UK VAT №: GB378323867. > EU VAT №: EU372013983. Turkish VAT №: 0861333524. South Korean VAT №: > 522-80-03080. AS207960 Ewrop OÜ, having a registered office at Lääne-Viru > maakond, Tapa vald, Porkuni küla, Lossi tn 1, 46001, trading as Glauca > Digital, is a company registered in Estonia under № 16755226. Estonian VAT > №: EE102625532. Glauca Digital and the Glauca logo are registered > trademarks in the UK, under № UK00003718474 and № UK00003718468, > respectively. > > > Ar Llun, 6 Ion 2025 am 18:04 Paul Wouters via Datatracker < > nore...@ietf.org> ysgrifennodd: > >> Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for >> draft-ietf-acme-onion-05: No Objection >> >> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all >> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this >> introductory paragraph, however.) >> >> >> Please refer to >> https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ >> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. >> >> >> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-acme-onion/ >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> COMMENT: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> I find the use of "example.com" confusing. Does this mean a valid DNS >> identifier in the real DNS accessed over the regular internet? If not, >> should >> it not be better to use "example.onion" ? Maybe also using something like >> "acme-server.example.com" could be a bit clearer? >> >> Maybe explaining (for non tor experts) the relationship between key >> identifiers >> and the XXXX.onion site name? >> >> Section 8.2: >> The use of "the author wishes" is a left over from when this was an >> individual >> document. As this is now a WG document it should be generalized, eg "it is >> desired" ? >> >> >> >>
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list -- acme@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to acme-le...@ietf.org
