Hi Paul, Thanks for the comments.
> I find the use of "example.com" confusing. The use of example.com is copied over directly from RFC8555, so I don't see a need to choose something different here. > Maybe explaining (for non tor experts) the relationship between key identifiers and the XXXX.onion site name? Could you elaborate? I don't quite follow. > The use of "the author wishes" is a left over from when this was an individual document. As this is now a WG document it should be generalized, eg "it is desired" ? Will fix. Q ------------------------------ Any statements contained in this email are personal to the author and are not necessarily the statements of the company unless specifically stated. AS207960 Cyfyngedig, having a registered office at 13 Pen-y-lan Terrace, Caerdydd, Cymru, CF23 9EU, trading as Glauca Digital, is a company registered in Wales under № 12417574 <https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/12417574>, LEI 875500FXNCJPAPF3PD10. ICO register №: ZA782876 <https://ico.org.uk/ESDWebPages/Entry/ZA782876>. UK VAT №: GB378323867. EU VAT №: EU372013983. Turkish VAT №: 0861333524. South Korean VAT №: 522-80-03080. AS207960 Ewrop OÜ, having a registered office at Lääne-Viru maakond, Tapa vald, Porkuni küla, Lossi tn 1, 46001, trading as Glauca Digital, is a company registered in Estonia under № 16755226. Estonian VAT №: EE102625532. Glauca Digital and the Glauca logo are registered trademarks in the UK, under № UK00003718474 and № UK00003718468, respectively. Ar Llun, 6 Ion 2025 am 18:04 Paul Wouters via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> ysgrifennodd: > Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-acme-onion-05: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to > https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-acme-onion/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I find the use of "example.com" confusing. Does this mean a valid DNS > identifier in the real DNS accessed over the regular internet? If not, > should > it not be better to use "example.onion" ? Maybe also using something like > "acme-server.example.com" could be a bit clearer? > > Maybe explaining (for non tor experts) the relationship between key > identifiers > and the XXXX.onion site name? > > Section 8.2: > The use of "the author wishes" is a left over from when this was an > individual > document. As this is now a WG document it should be generalized, eg "it is > desired" ? > > > >
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list -- acme@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to acme-le...@ietf.org
