Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-acme-onion-05: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-acme-onion/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I find the use of "example.com" confusing. Does this mean a valid DNS identifier in the real DNS accessed over the regular internet? If not, should it not be better to use "example.onion" ? Maybe also using something like "acme-server.example.com" could be a bit clearer? Maybe explaining (for non tor experts) the relationship between key identifiers and the XXXX.onion site name? Section 8.2: The use of "the author wishes" is a left over from when this was an individual document. As this is now a WG document it should be generalized, eg "it is desired" ? _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list -- acme@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to acme-le...@ietf.org
