Hi, 6lo WG. I support the adoption for draft-li-6lo-native-short-address-03. >From the IETF 111 meeting, this draft was sufficiently discussed and I believe that it has positive feedback from 6lo WG. As Pascal said, this draft has better to consider the narrow applicability and try to find a common/general use case.
Best regards. Yong-Geun. 2022년 8월 5일 (금) 오후 8:28, Luigi IANNONE <luigi.iannone= 40huawei....@dmarc.ietf.org>님이 작성: > Hi Pascal, > > > > *From:* 6lo <6lo-boun...@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *Pascal Thubert > (pthubert) > *Sent:* Friday, 5 August 2022 12:28 > *To:* Tommaso Pecorella <tommaso.pecore...@unifi.it> > *Cc:* Carles Gomez Montenegro <carle...@entel.upc.edu>; 6lo@ietf.org > *Subject:* Re: [6lo] Call for WG adoption of > draft-li-6lo-native-short-address-03 > > > > Hello Tommaso: > > > > Good to hear from you… > > > > My first concern is related to the applicability of the idea. Do we have > any standard L2 that will build a tree that will never change? This is not > the case of Ethernet spanning tree as you know. I’ve met such an IoT case > once in my life, in a very specific application network where numbering or > frame size were the least of their problems. > > The IETF is reaching 10K RFC. This obfuscates our work, even to ourselves, > and doesn’t serve the end users. We need RFCs that solve problems in the > real world and the first step for that is to demonstrate that the proposal > applies to a real network. We need RFCs that apply the most generically > possible. How is that the case here? > > > > That is something you need to bring to the attention of the IESG. > > Actually there is a new WG for such kind of discussions: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/rfcedtyp/rswg/about/ > > It is not the role of any WG to filter documents based non-documented > publications policies. > > > > Ciao > > > > Luigi > > > > > > Take care, > > > > Pascal > > > > Le 4 août 2022 à 21:50, Tommaso Pecorella <tommaso.pecore...@unifi.it> a > écrit : > > Hi all, > > > > I had the opportunity to see this proposal from the beginning, and to talk > extensively about it with the authors. > > > > The present draft does not fully cover some essential parts, like the > robustness of the methodology in case of link failure, but I think that > these can - and should - be the subject of an extra document. > > > > I do agree with Pascal about the fact that this proposal is “below” the IP > level, but I disagree on his conclusions. The proposal, in my opinion, has > enough interactions with the IPv6 address operations (e.g., neighbour > discovery, scope of addresses, etc.) to be worth to be discussed in this > group. > > > > Moreover, despite the quite specific applicability scenarios, the risk to > not standardise it in the IETF scope is to have (yet another) proprietary > standard that directly impacts the IP layer, leading to interoperability > nightmares (read: total lack of interoperability between devices). > > > > Hence, I’m favourable for a WG adoption. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Tommaso Pecorella > > > > > > > > On 1 Aug 2022, at 09:58, Carles Gomez Montenegro <carle...@entel.upc.edu> > wrote: > > > > Dear 6lo WG, > > This message starts a call for WG adoption for > draft-li-6lo-native-short-address-03. > > (Link below: > > https://www.google.com/url?q=https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-li-6lo-native-short-address-03&source=gmail-imap&ust=1659970630000000&usg=AOvVaw1wg_-bvDuMmSw50lPNMu5k > ) > > Considering that some folks may be on vacation currently or in the next > few days, the call will end on the 22nd of August, EOB. > > Please state whether you are in favor of adopting this document. > > Also, any comments you may have, and/or expressions of interest to review > the document, will be very much appreciated. > > Thanks, > > Shwetha and Carles > > _______________________________________________ > 6lo mailing list > 6lo@ietf.org > > https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo&source=gmail-imap&ust=1659970630000000&usg=AOvVaw0i_toV1jgA4ThVjf5vBmqX > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > ``It's not worth doing something unless you were doing something that > someone, somewere, would much rather you weren't doing.'' > > -- Terry Pratchett > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Tommaso Pecorella - Ph.D. > > > > Associate professor > > Dpt. Ingegneria dell'Informazione > > Università di Firenze > > > > CNIT - Università di Firenze Unit > > > > via di S. Marta 3 > > 50139, Firenze > > ITALY > > > > email: tommaso.pecore...@unifi.it <tommaso.pecore...@unifi.it> > > tommaso.pecore...@cnit.it > > > > phone : +39-055-2758540 > > mobile: +39-320-4379803 > > fax : +39-055-2758570 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > 6lo mailing list > 6lo@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo > > _______________________________________________ > 6lo mailing list > 6lo@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo >
_______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list 6lo@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
