Hi Pascal and all, As we know, the discussion of whether routing in LLN networks should run at Layer 2 or Layer 3 (network layer) has become a very sensitive issue for a long time. With the advent of multiple low-power link layer technologies, such as IEEE 802.15.4, Wi-Fi, and PLC, network layer routing is clearly required. However, the separation of mesh-under and route-over processes induces suboptimal routes and (L2 and L3) duplicated re-route overhead.
This draft’s topological addressing method can integrate address and route information into a single place. It will help to run IP layer on various link layer technologies and meanwhile avoid above duplicated re-route issues. Thanks Pascal for continuous advices and comments. As author of this draft, I want to state support of this adoption. Regards, Guangpeng Li From: 6lo <6lo-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Pascal Thubert (pthubert) Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2022 12:37 PM To: Jing Wang <wangjin...@chinamobile.com> Cc: Carles Gomez Montenegro <carle...@entel.upc.edu>; 6lo <6lo@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [6lo] Call for WG adoption of draft-li-6lo-native-short-address-03 Hello Carles I have reviewed the work carefully. I believe that we can achieve short packets with 6lo and SCHC so that piece is not an essential progress. So 6lo as an INT areaWg does not need it.The essential progress is meshing without routing. It’s probably hard to justify it at the routing area though the authors could try. My feeling is that the idea is interesting but has a very narrow applicability, which is in essence the opposite of IP. The progress applies only to very specific L2 networks. This tells me that it is really an L2 technology and should be used for MAC not IP. Bottom line is that I do not believe that the work belongs to the IETF. I do not support adoption at 6lo. Regards, Pascal Le 2 août 2022 à 18:01, Jing Wang <wangjin...@chinamobile.com<mailto:wangjin...@chinamobile.com>> a écrit : Hi WG, I support the adoption call. In my opinion, this can help enlarge scope of IP network, considering it may consume less resource of constrained nodes. BR, Jing Wang From: Carles Gomez Montenegro<mailto:carle...@entel.upc.edu> Date: 2022-08-01 22:58 To: 6lo<mailto:6lo@ietf.org> Subject: [6lo] Call for WG adoption of draft-li-6lo-native-short-address-03 Dear 6lo WG, This message starts a call for WG adoption for draft-li-6lo-native-short-address-03. (Link below: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-li-6lo-native-short-address-03) Considering that some folks may be on vacation currently or in the next few days, the call will end on the 22nd of August, EOB. Please state whether you are in favor of adopting this document. Also, any comments you may have, and/or expressions of interest to review the document, will be very much appreciated. Thanks, Shwetha and Carles _______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list 6lo@ietf.org<mailto:6lo@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo _______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list 6lo@ietf.org<mailto:6lo@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
_______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list 6lo@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
