> From: Paul Kraus [mailto:p...@kraus-haus.org]
> 
> > So if you were to enable the sharesmb property on a zfs filesystem in
sol10,
> > you just get an error or something?
> 
>     Nope. The command succeeds and the flag gets set on the dataset.
> Since there is no kernel process to read the flag and act on it,
> nothing happens (at least, that is my experience).

hehehehe.   Silent fail.   The best type of fail.    ;-)

BTW, what is the advantage of the kernel cifs server as opposed to samba?
It seems, years ago, somebody must have been standing around and saying
"There is a glaring deficiency in samba, and we need to solve it."  

I can see a few glaring deficiencies in the other direction too - but I'd
like to know the differences more clearly.

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to