Err...I meant Nexenta Core. -J
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Jason J. W. Williams < jasonjwwilli...@gmail.com> wrote: > 134 it is. This is an OpenSolaris rig that's going to be replaced within > the next 60 days, so just need to get it to something that won't through > false checksum errors like the 120-123 builds do and has decent rebuild > times. > > Future boxes will be NexentaStor. > > Thank you guys. :) > > -J > > On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Richard Elling <rich...@nexenta.com>wrote: > >> On Sep 26, 2010, at 1:16 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: >> >>> Upgrading is definitely an option. What is the current snv favorite >> >>> for ZFS stability? I apologize, with all the Oracle/Sun changes I >> >>> haven't been paying as close attention to big reports on zfs-discuss >> >>> as I used to. >> >> >> >> OpenIndiana b147 is the latest binary release, but it also includes >> >> the fix for >> >> CR6494473, ZFS needs a way to slow down resilvering >> >> http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6494473 >> >> http://www.openindiana.org >> > >> > Are you sure upgrading to OI is safe at this point? 134 is stable unless >> you start fiddling with dedup, and OI is hardly tested. For a production >> setup, I'd recommend 134 >> >> For a production setup? For production I'd recommend something that is >> supported, preferably NexentaStor 3 (which is b134 + important ZFS fixes >> :-) >> -- richard >> >> -- >> OpenStorage Summit, October 25-27, Palo Alto, CA >> http://nexenta-summit2010.eventbrite.com >> >> Richard Elling >> rich...@nexenta.com +1-760-896-4422 >> Enterprise class storage for everyone >> www.nexenta.com >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> zfs-discuss mailing list >> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss >> > >
_______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
