On Sep 26, 2010, at 1:16 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: >>> Upgrading is definitely an option. What is the current snv favorite >>> for ZFS stability? I apologize, with all the Oracle/Sun changes I >>> haven't been paying as close attention to big reports on zfs-discuss >>> as I used to. >> >> OpenIndiana b147 is the latest binary release, but it also includes >> the fix for >> CR6494473, ZFS needs a way to slow down resilvering >> http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6494473 >> http://www.openindiana.org > > Are you sure upgrading to OI is safe at this point? 134 is stable unless you > start fiddling with dedup, and OI is hardly tested. For a production setup, > I'd recommend 134
For a production setup? For production I'd recommend something that is supported, preferably NexentaStor 3 (which is b134 + important ZFS fixes :-) -- richard -- OpenStorage Summit, October 25-27, Palo Alto, CA http://nexenta-summit2010.eventbrite.com Richard Elling rich...@nexenta.com +1-760-896-4422 Enterprise class storage for everyone www.nexenta.com _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
