Upgrading is definitely an option. What is the current snv favorite for ZFS stability? I apologize, with all the Oracle/Sun changes I haven't been paying as close attention to big reports on zfs-discuss as I used to.
-J Sent via iPhone Is your e-mail Premiere? On Sep 26, 2010, at 10:22, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <r...@karlsbakk.net> wrote: > > I just witnessed a resilver that took 4h for 27gb of data. Setup is 3x > raid-z2 stripes with 6 disks per raid-z2. Disks are 500gb in size. No > checksum errors. > > It seems like an exorbitantly long time. The other 5 disks in the stripe with > the replaced disk were at 90% busy and ~150io/s each during the resilver. > Does this seem unusual to anyone else? Could it be due to heavy fragmentation > or do I have a disk in the stripe going bad? Post-resilver no disk is above > 30% util or noticeably higher than any other disk. > > Thank you in advance. (kernel is snv123) > It surely seems a long time for 27 gigs. Scrub takes its time, but for this > 50TB setup with currently ~29TB used, on WD Green drives (yeah, I know > they're bad, but I didn't know that at the time I installed the box, and they > have worked flawlessly for a year or so), scrub takes a bit of time, but > nothing comparible to what you're reporting > > scrub: scrub completed after 47h57m with 0 errors on Fri Sep 3 16:57:26 > 2010 > > Also, snv123 is quite old, is upgrading to 134 an option? > > Vennlige hilsener / Best regards > > roy > -- > Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk > (+47) 97542685 > r...@karlsbakk.net > http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/ > -- > I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres intelligibelt. Det > er et elementært imperativ for alle pedagoger å unngå eksessiv anvendelse av > idiomer med fremmed opprinnelse. I de fleste tilfeller eksisterer adekvate og > relevante synonymer på norsk.
_______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
