"David Dyer-Bennet" <d...@dd-b.net> wrote:
> >> As such, they'll need to continue to comply with GPLv2 requirements.
> >
> > No, there is definitely no need for Oracle to comply with the GPL as they
> > own the code.
>
> Ray's point is, how long would BTRFS remain in the Linux kernel in that case?
Such a license change can happen at any time. The Linux folks have no grant
that it would not happen.
Jörg
--
EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
j...@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog:
http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
