can you guess? wrote: > CERN was using relatively cheap disks and found that they were more > than adequate (at least for any normal consumer use) without that > additional level of protection: the incidence of errors, even > including the firmware errors which presumably would not have occurred > in a normal consumer installation lacking hardware RAID, was on the > order of 1 per TB - and given that it's really, really difficult for a > consumer to come anywhere near that much data without most of it being > video files (which just laugh and keep playing when they discover > small errors) that's pretty much tantamount to saying that consumers > would encounter no *noticeable* errors at all.
bull* -- richard _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
