How would one calculate system reliability estimates here? One is a RAIDZ 
set of 6 disks, the other a set of 8. The reliability of each RAIDZ set by 
itself isn't too hard to calculate, but put together, especially since 
they're different sizes, I don't know.

On Jul 19 2007, Richard Elling wrote:

>After a cup of French coffee, I feel strong enough to recommend :-)
>
>David Smith wrote:
>> What are your thoughts or recommendations on having a zpool made up of 
>> raidz groups of different sizes? Are there going to be performance 
>> issues?
>
> It is more complicated and, in general, more complicated is a bad thing. 
> But in your example, with only 2 top-level vdevs, it isn't overly 
> complicated.
>
> Performance issues will be difficult to predict because this hasn't been 
> studied. With the gazillions of possible permutations, it is not likely 
> to be extensively characterized. But it if it works for you, then be 
> happy :-)
>  -- richard
>
>> For example:
>> 
>>   pool: testpool1
>>  state: ONLINE
>>  scrub: none requested
>> config:
>> 
>>         NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
>>         testpool1 ONLINE 0 0 0
>> 
>>           raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0
>>             c12t600A0B800029E5EA000007234685122Ad0 ONLINE 0 0 0
>>             c12t600A0B800029E5EA000007254685123Cd0 ONLINE 0 0 0
>>             c12t600A0B800029E5EA0000072F46851256d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
>>             c12t600A0B800029E5EA0000073146851266d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
>>             c12t600A0B800029E5EA0000073746851278d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
>>             c12t600A0B800029E5EA0000074146851292d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
>>             c12t600A0B800029E5EA00000747468512B6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
>>             c12t600A0B800029E5EA00000749468512C2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
>>           raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0
>>             c12t600A0B800029E5EA0000074F468512E0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
>>             c12t600A0B800029E5EA00000751468512E8d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
>>             c12t600A0B800029E5EA000007574685130Cd0 ONLINE 0 0 0
>>             c12t600A0B800029E5EA0000075946851318d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
>>             c12t600A0B800029E5EA0000075F4685132Ed0 ONLINE 0 0 0
>>             c12t600A0B800029E5EA0000076546851342d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> David
>>  
>>  
>> This message posted from opensolaris.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> zfs-discuss mailing list
>> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
>_______________________________________________
>zfs-discuss mailing list
>zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
>http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
>

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to